Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit LassoRing's column >>

LASSORING

A Canadian and a citizen of the world.
Articles Posted: 3  Links Seeded: 4
Member Since: 2/2012  Last Seen: 5/09/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Adjusting in the Cave

Tue Feb 21, 2012 7:07 PM EST
odd-news, war, canada, un, democracy, debate, arms, harper, declaration-of-human-rights
By LassoRing
Advertise | AdChoices

In the 2011 federal election, over a quarter of eligible voters, didn't vote. 27% of the non-voters didn't care about the election.

Many of the people who voted were frustrated with their own non-Conservative provincial government, the NDP and Liberals, so they voted for the opposite federally. Two wrongs don't make a right.

What many voters failed to see is the clash between the provincial and the federal governments during Harper's first term, beginning in 2006. He counted on that ignorance, destroyed any faith people had in other parties, and won a second term. Divide and conquer.

I've heard many of Harper's supporters say they perceive him to be a strong leader. They're right in their perception, and belief that Canada needs strong leadership. However, there is a difference between strength and dictatorship.

Hold my hand and I'll give you a tour of the darkest part of the cave, where a fire burns bright. Then we will walk out of the darkness and into the sunlight together.

Elimination of Democracy

Deep in the cave, on the lowest level, there is a fire that burns at the heart of democracy called Debate. Without at least two sides offering differing views of an issue in order for the leader to make a fair final judgement, debating becomes one-sided and pointless.

The death of democracy.

Fast-tracking dangerous legislations, including the crime omnibus, in Parliament has been happening at record speed since Harper was voted into a second term, based on the false notion it's in Canada's best interests.

While Members of Parliament such as Peter Van Loan from the article above, claim their approach, albeit aggressive, is in line with democracy and fair debate. This is a lie.

Look away from the spell-binding light of the fire for a moment and acknowledge the created shadows on the cave walls. Not a single amendment made by the NDP Opposition has been accepted.

There is no fairness, the Senate is one-sided, and Parliament is corrupted by the Tories.

Now we turn away from the searing heat of the cave fire and endure the chill of darkness. Keep holding my hand for two more stops on this tour.

Lack of Cooperation between Federal and Provincial Healthcare

Although many similar cases can be found across Canada, for the sake of simplicity, I'm going to use Manitoba as a specific example.

Manitoba has been an NDP province for 40 elections. It's a social-democratic province, a system that directly contradicts Harper's aggressive conservatives. Gary Doer was the province's Premier for a number of years until he stepped down to accept a job as ambassador, and he was well-loved.

As NDP as Manitobans are, the majority of voters, voted for Harper, a Conservative. In the previous election, the majority voted NDP.

There have been many problems in Manitoba in the past few years, such as lack of hospital beds, no preparations for the increasing elderly population, and little to no winter maintenance. Manitoba averages 6 to 10 feet snow per year, so lack of snow removal has been a disaster.

Manitobans blamed the loss of Gary Doer, who was a prime example of a good, strong leader. Manitobans have accused the NDP of acting like progressive conservatives. This is untrue. Here's the difference.

Harper hadn't been voted into power yet when Doer was first elected in 1990. Greg Selinger, the current Premier and also leader of the Manitoba NDP, has been doing nothing but dealing with the Harper government.

Funny the perceptions of the Manitobans. They're right. The Manitoba NDP has been acting like progressive conservatives, but not by choice.

Due to lack of support or cooperation from the Harper government, hospital services have been cut. Not enough beds and not enough helping hands.

A homeless man, Brian Sinclair, waited 34 hours in the ER at the Health Sciences, and died of a bladder infection caused by a blocked catheter.

While everyone seeks to blame the Manitoba government, the federal government has turned a blind eye and has been very quiet about the incident.

Take my hand again, I'll show you the last stop in the tour and explain why Herr Harper and his army has refused responsibility.

Enemy of Canada

Many things are worded differently here. We've been so bombarded with American media since North American free trade was established in 1988, that most have either forgotten or simply don't know the Canadian terminology.

"Enemy of Canada" is the American equivalent of "terrorist." The term, in Canadian laws, only applies to times of war, and not always applied correctly. Japanese Brittish Columbia residents, during World War II, were declared "enemies of Canada" and confined. That's a sad and shameful aspect of our history that few are willing to acknowledge, and all want to forget.

Canada is not at war with any country right now, not since 1945. The war is actually happening in our own backyards, and it's fiction created by Harper.

Having anyone or any group declared officially as "enemies of Canada," would allow the government to activate laws regarding suspected terrorists. This would include torture and imprisonment.

It's bullying, plain and simple.

The following people and groups have been threatened with being declared "Enemies of Canada" or "Adversaries".

Andrew Frank, employee of ForestEthnics who criticized the west coast oil pipeline project.

The brave Andrew Frank opened a big can of worms which lead people to find out all environment groups and First Nations who oppose the pipeline are also documented as "adversaries" of Canada.

As you can see from the above, these are not terrorists. They're Canadian citizens, people who care about the environment, who simply don't fall in line with Harper.

Now here's comes the explanation I promised to provide. Brian Sinclair, who died waiting in the ER, was First Nations.

Harper is more than a dictator. He's walking a fine line and veering toward genocide of anyone who simply opposes him.

See that spot of light ahead? Join me now, and I'll show you.

We're Canadians. Most of us don't have guns, but we do have pens and computers.

And we have The United Nations.

Read and study the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. You'll find the darkness. You'll find that the Tories under Stephen Harper's rule has, or are at risk of, violating numerous articles covered by the Declaration, including article 25 which states access to basic medical care is a human right.

Arm every Canadian citizen, every man, woman and child, with this most powerful ammo – The Declaration of Human Rights.

Harper wants a war. So be it.

Dark times have fallen on Canada. Get used it and adjust your eyes to the darkness. Then, when you're ready, give up the illusions of shadows created by the cave fire, recognize them for the smokescreens they really are, and walk with me into sunlight, even if it hurts your eyes. The price of freedom is worth it.

"Better to be the poor servant of a poor master, and to endure anything,
rather than think as they do and live after their manner."

- Allegory of the Cave, Plato

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • LassoRing's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: SuperVine!, The Guidepost
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (44)
Synthesis

Excellent stuff, LassoRing, and more original content to boot! It's great to see this, especially given Newsvine's latter-day emphasis on seeding, and on U.S.-centric political opinion pieces.

If i take your meaning correctly, you are advocating for resistance based on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and enlisting the United Nations.

I don't disagree with the strategy, particularly as it has been used to some positive effect by First Nations people.

But I wonder about your views on the efficacy of Canada's courts, and the use of our own Charter of Rights?

Finally, for those who want to fully understand the full scope of the cave metaphor employed here, I must recommend an earlier companion piece to this article.

Without Eyes in the Cave.

  • 2 votes
Reply#1 - Tue Feb 21, 2012 7:21 PM EST
LassoRing

Thanks for posting the recommendation ;)

You got it right, that's exactly the strategy I suggested. Time to take it to a higher power.

I had read and studied our charter of rights and was disappointed to realize it lacked failsafes for a scenario like the one above. No one exepected the real enemy to be the one running the country.

The main disadvantage to the Canadian constitution and charter of rights is they're not properly drawn up documents. They are, in fact, admended versions of the original British Act of 1867, which was designed to control and appease the colonists.

While I do feel it continues to give leverage for the righs of First Nations and Inuits, if they want to go that route, but I don't feel it gives leverage to the average Canadian citizen.

Though I can't prove it, in my honest opinion, I feel the documents could activate old ways and turn us all back into colonists. The main reason I say this is because Canada is not an independent country. Unless we declare full indepence, preferably with the support of the UN, any Canadian documents simply looks good on paper.

And, I believe, Harper knows this.

On a side note, if you can find anything in the charter of rights that would be fail proof, by all means, let me know!

  • 2 votes
Reply#2 - Tue Feb 21, 2012 7:47 PM EST
etva

Excellent article, LassoRing! It seems the US and Canada are following similar paths, though we tend to be louder and more belligerent about it down here.

Voted up.

  • 2 votes
Reply#3 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:29 AM EST
Synthesis

following similar paths

*sigh*

Gawd, I hope not.....

  • 2 votes
#3.1 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 7:03 PM EST
etva

LOL! No kidding. I was kind of hoping I could escape to Canada!

  • 1 vote
#3.2 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 8:22 PM EST
Synthesis

Might be you still can. A lot of us are bound and determined that the Tories be turfed next election, so hopefully we can minimize the worst of the damage.

Even with a majority, the most egregious of their agenda still faces challenges, as Vic Toews found out recently.

The Internet vs Vic Toews: Score One for the Tweeps.

  • 1 vote
#3.3 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 8:24 PM EST
etva

I do hope so!

  • 1 vote
#3.4 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:41 PM EST
Reply
LassoRing

Thank you, Etva.

I wonder about that loudness. I remember, when I was a kid, there were plenty of Canadian media in which we all learned exactly what was happening.

I can't help but wonder. Are Canadians really not as loud? Or is it that our sovereignty has been slowly murdered for the past 25 years and now we're left dazed, and unable to say anything?

I'm weary of the media. Some of my favorite music artists never get media attention, yet I know they are far more talented than those that are receiving the attention.

My tentative conclusion is the media doesn't speak for Canadians anymore, and hasn't been speaking for us for too long.

In my opinion and observations, Canadians appear to be beaten out of media attention, which only makes as appear more quiet.

I believe this is another created shadow on the cave wall.

  • 2 votes
Reply#4 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:58 AM EST
etva

I would agree. I don't see media as speaking for anyone other than their corporate masters, but perhaps that's just my personal bias.

  • 1 vote
#4.1 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 5:07 PM EST
Synthesis

Think you're both right.

Time we reclaimed the media....particularly since we have the means today, with the internet and all that it makes possible.

Imagine, I read an (old) article just yesterday that posited that what people do on NV (and similar sites) is just pointless, and has no effect on anything.

What a bizarre thing to suggest! Considering that I was quoted by CNN a couple of years back during the Sea of Green, during which we regularly broke news as much as 24 hours before the MSM, such a proposition is not only pandering to the dead old establishment media's desire to pretend they retain a stranglehold on our right to know, but is also just demonstrably false.

  • 1 vote
#4.2 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 7:07 PM EST
etva

Excellent point, Synth! We do have the tools and the ability to make a difference -- if we would turn off the TV and think for ourselves.

  • 1 vote
#4.3 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 8:25 PM EST
Synthesis

I like to have a little jazz in the background as I pen @!$%#-disturbing tomes, though.

;-)

  • 1 vote
#4.4 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 8:30 PM EST
etva

LOL! That's just setting the mood - not quite the type of propaganda I was referring to:)

  • 1 vote
#4.5 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:43 PM EST
Synthesis

Well, it depends. We could be talking about freeform jazz.....

  • 1 vote
#4.6 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:11 PM EST
etva

Woo Hoo! LOL:)

  • 1 vote
#4.7 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 10:09 AM EST
Reply
Kearney Outlaw

Excellent article, LassoRing.

Is there any evidence that the United States has influence here? Either as a role model some wish to follow, or (as is the case with some other countries) just plain economic bullying?

I'm reminded of Margaret Thatcher's horrific emulation of "Reaganomics" and what a mess that was for Britain.

  • 2 votes
Reply#5 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 5:44 PM EST
Synthesis

I think Harper is definitely involved in emulating the Bush-era Neocons. Lasso? What's your take?

  • 1 vote
#5.1 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 7:08 PM EST
Reply
LassoRing

Kearney, since I used Manitoba as an example in this article, I'll do the same to answer your question.

The same year Detroit televison was introduced as a channel for the basic cable package in Manitoba, was the same year Winnipeg became the murder capital of Canada.

Food for thought ;)

In regards to similarities, I would have to disagree. Our problems are not similiar. Unlike the US, Canada isn't founded on capitalism, it's founded on sovereignty. We don't have the 1%, we don't even have a Wall Street.

No, the real problem is an apathetic attitude toward our own sovereignty.

On a lighter side, when Nixen ordered a draft for Vietnam, he nicely boosted the Canadian hippy population when Americans escaping the draft ran to Canada. So, I say, come on over :)

  • 2 votes
Reply#6 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:13 PM EST
etva

No, the real problem is an apathetic attitude toward our own sovereignty.

Americans also have a history of apathy, trusting in what we're told, and pursuing our own personal agendas. I will say, that it seems some are waking up - kind of like grouchy bears coming out of hibernation, but at least it's awareness of a type:)

  • 1 vote
#6.1 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:49 PM EST
Kearney Outlaw

The same year Detroit televison was introduced as a channel for the basic cable package in Manitoba, was the same year Winnipeg became the murder capital of Canada.

When was that? I might have mentioned on an earlier post that my wife is from Winnipeg, and I've been there quite a few times. She grew up in the North End (St. John's was her school) and I know she said it was rough back then--that was in the seventies. (On a side-note, if anyone's in the area, Kalekis on Main is friggin' AWESOME.)

Now, you can't tell me there is NO capitalism. There is the Bay. ;-)

  • 2 votes
#6.2 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:02 PM EST
LassoRing

I missed this comment.

That's something I was thinking about recently, I'd love to know your thoughts.

My impression is many Americans have gotten stuck into this repetition of "but that's un-American."

It's un-American to speak against the goverment, even if what they're doing is wrong.

It's un-American to attack someone for getting rich, even if they're forcing others to remain poor.

It's un-American to speak against the military, even if the war is for all the wrong reasons.

I'm sensing a pattern here. If all of that and more is un-American, what's left that you can call truly American?

  • 2 votes
#6.3 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:06 PM EST
etva

6.3 - UnAmerican:

That's something I've been pondering as well, and truthfully, I've begun to see patriotism as little more than propaganda -- a tool to emphasize differences rather than our many similarities. We're bombarded with messages telling us how special we are - American exceptionalism.

But really, it's just a way to make us focus on the illusion, rather than the reality taking place beyond our immediate perception.

  • 1 vote
#6.4 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 10:15 AM EST
LassoRing

That's interesting, I've also gotten that perception that American patriotism has become an illusion.

I one had a... not so polite discussion with an American who violently argued the US is a republic democracy. So I asked, while yes that's how it was intended, when's the last time you voted and elected someone you feel truly represents your voice, as is suppose to be in a republic?

He had no answer.

This same man argued that any kind of socialism, including social democracy, is against the constitution and has no place in America.

So I said, really? Then why do you call it Social security?

  • 2 votes
#6.5 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 11:38 AM EST
etva

Yeah. All too often we focus on the emotions and history associated with words, rather than the reality of what they have come to actually be in our lives.

We hear the word "democracy" and everyone thinks "freedom of choice," but it's not freedom if it's forced on a country that didn't choose it, and contrary to our perceptions and beliefs, not everyone wants it.

We hear the word "patriotism" and think it's a good word that unites us, when in fact, it's separating us from the rest of the world.

Public relations is truly an art:)

  • 2 votes
#6.6 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 1:36 PM EST
LassoRing

Yet another reason I'm glad I'm not in charge of the world. I'll just keep writing my articles and hope it's spreads the word of a little thing called... common sense.

I read somewhere recently, "Common Sense. So rare it's almost a super power."

  • 2 votes
#6.7 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 1:41 PM EST
Reply
LassoRing

To let everyone know, I'm saving Thatcher-Mulroney-Regan for another article.

Oh, and before I forget, Synth? Whoever said online news and social media is useless, should take a good hard look at the revolution in Egypt. And if they already know, then they're just scared of the fact that online communication is more powerful.

  • 2 votes
Reply#7 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:17 PM EST
Synthesis

Lasso, I think you're exactly right, and those who have said that about Newsvine are just trying to justify their highly conservative viewpoints, which are exactly in line with their lap dog behaviour regarding big media and the corporate bosses thereof.

On this point, though, we may disagree somewhat:

We don't have the 1%, we don't even have a Wall Street.

That's because I believe we do have a 1%, and if anything, it's much more concentrated (names like Bronfman, Eaton, Thompson, Desmarais, Rogers, Asper, Martin and Weston come to mind), being vested in maybe 30 or 40 families instead of 300 or 400 as in the states.

Bay Street is just as vicious as Wall Street, in their own way. They just don't have to be as overt about it because Canadians, interested in 'peace, order and good governance" tend to be a little less unruly than our neighbours to the south.

  • 2 votes
#7.1 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:25 PM EST
Kearney Outlaw

I really enjoy the posts from you guys.

LassoRing, I'd be very happy if you accepted my FR.

  • 2 votes
#7.2 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:05 PM EST
LassoRing

Accepted, and I'm very glad you like the posts.

  • 2 votes
#7.3 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:15 PM EST
Reply
LassoRing

That sounds an awful like Ontario ;)

Upper and Lower Canada still exists in the subconscious. Weird but true.

Are you certain Canada has a 1%, or simply those who are old money? Because there is a rather huge difference. The former is based on monetary figures, the latter is based on personal perception.

  • 2 votes
Reply#8 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:32 PM EST
Synthesis

Yeah, I guess it is Ontario at that.

Are you certain Canada has a 1%,

Well, probably about .25%....but nevertheless....

  • 1 vote
#8.1 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:41 PM EST
Reply
LassoRing

hehehe...

I do understand what you're referring to, don't get me wrong. But it's iermprtant to understand that the American 1% is about the rich getting richer, while the poor are getting poorer. A severe imbalance.

I read an interesting article about a Wall Street CEO who decided to cross over and join the occupy movement. He said, based on years of experience (he's in his 60's) that "the game is rigged." I think that pretty much sums it up.

If that kind of rigged game is happening in Canada, it would be on such a smaller scale, and it wouldn't be forcing the Canadian poor to become poorer.

However, we are facing a similar scenario, with corporations hoarding the wealth.

As an example, in 2009, the pharmacutical industry earned a total of 8 billion dollars, which is twice as much as what the music industry earned that same year.

Not a single head office in the pharmacutical industry is located in Canada.

We don't have a 1%.

We have a 100% of all Canadians being screwed over by foreign industries.

  • 2 votes
Reply#9 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:01 PM EST
Synthesis

We have a 100% of all Canadians being screwed over by foreign industries.

On that, we agree....

  • 2 votes
#9.1 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:15 PM EST
LassoRing

Good to know :)

  • 2 votes
#9.2 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:28 PM EST
Synthesis

I work right next to the Electro-Motive plant in London where the workers were locked out by Caterpillar, who then decided to shut the plant down and move production to Illinois when the workers wouldn't sit still for a 50% pay cut and raping of their pensions.

Caterpillar are union-busting @!$%#wads, and only the tip of the foreign exploitation iceberg.

  • 1 vote
#9.3 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:39 PM EST
LassoRing

Many sad examples of that all over Canada. Why do you think so many big box stores have moved in? Foreign industries has created huge holes, and big box stores are filling them.

Speaking of rape, you reminded me.

  • 2 votes
#9.4 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:24 PM EST
Reply
LassoRing

ignore typos please...

  • 1 vote
Reply#10 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:02 PM EST
LassoRing

Kearney, for some reason there isn't a reply link to the earlier comment, I hope you'll scroll down.

Re: Detroit television.

I can't recall the exact year offhand, early 90's at the latest I think? I'll have to dig that info up. Unless you find it before I do...

  • 1 vote
Reply#11 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:20 PM EST
Kearney Outlaw

I won't. I'd have no clue what to Google except maybe "Detroit TV Winnipeg"!

My wife left Winnipeg in '77, so she's no help. :-)

Thanks for accepting!

  • 3 votes
#11.1 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:32 PM EST
Synthesis

I left Winnipeg in '87, but for the life of me I can't recall if Detroit TV was part of basic cable or not.....partly because I didn't have a TV in those days, and partly because, well....there are some fairly significant blank spots from those days.

I do remember Stan Kubicek on CKND, though....he always looked like a flatulent fellow.....

  • 1 vote
#11.2 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:37 PM EST
Reply
LassoRing

This is the best I could find.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Videon_Cablesystems

That article does touch on the complaints about Detroit televion in 1993, but I'm still uncertain on the exact year it was introduced.

At least my estimate is pretty close, early 90's.

  • 1 vote
Reply#12 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:49 PM EST
Kearney Outlaw

Synth furnished a good clue when I looked up Stan. Gives a glimpse of some Winnipeg's viewing choices. I'm thinking your guess of the early 90's is spot on.

This, from the Wikipedia link on CKND-DT:

On January 1, 1986, channel 12 returned in Pembina, North Dakota, as KNRR, a satellite of independent station KVRR channel 15 in Fargo. Canadian cable operators were prohibited from distributing the signal, however, by an October 1986 CRTC decision in response to broadcaster concerns about the "potentially damaging effect of this station by providing Canadian advertisers with access to large amounts of commercial airtime at rates substantially lower than those they would be obliged to pay Canadian television licensees in order to reach the same potential audience."[10] As the satellite station was never profitable due to its location, as well as its difficulties in being able to reach the Winnipeg audience, KNRR went off the air from June to October 2009 as the station did not upgrade to a digital signal.

Along with the other Canwest-owned stations, CKND was rebranded as Global in the fall of 1997. CKND's studios also produce Fox Soccer Report, which airs throughout the world on Fox Sports World Canada, Fox Soccer Channel, and Fox Sports Middle East. On September 1, 2008, CKND moved its operations downtown to Canwest Place. On August 28, 2011, CKND ceased broadcasting over the air in analog.

  • 1 vote
#12.1 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 12:03 AM EST
LassoRing

Good find!

Yes, it seems that American televison, as in the bad media such as Fox, has been a slow invasion.

Now that digital televison and privitized corporations have taken over the media, that line which was once drawn, has now completely blurred.

    #12.2 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 11:43 AM EST
    Reply
    LassoRingDeleted
    LassoRing

    Completely off topic, but I have to take a moment to say all of you have been wonderful in welcoming me to the Vine and you're all fantastic conversationalists.

    • 2 votes
    Reply#14 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:56 PM EST
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
    (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
    Newsvine Privacy Statement
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    FUN STUFF:
    • Leaderboard |
    • E-Mail Alerts |
    • Top of the Vine |
    • Newsvine Live |
    • Newsvine Archives |
    • The Greenhouse |
    COMPANY STUFF:
    • Code of Honor |
    • Company Info |
    • Contact Us |
    • Jobs |
    • User Agreement |
    • Privacy Policy |
    • About our ads
    LEGAL STUFF:
    • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com